<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Idea magazine &#187; screen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/tag/screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk</link>
	<description>Bad Idea is an invaluable source of information and quality journalism about cultural and economic innovation in Britain and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CBS Video Advertising Experiment Decidedly Unfuturistic</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creative Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben beaumont-thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad.jpg" ></a>American TV network CBS has teamed up with Pepsi to bring video advertising into print, with an upcoming issue of Entertainment Weekly <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">featuring</a>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad.jpg" ><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5875" title="CBS Video Advertising Experiment Decidedly Unfuturistic" src="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad-475x378.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="272" /></a>American TV network CBS has teamed up with Pepsi to bring video advertising into print, with an upcoming issue of Entertainment Weekly <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">featuring a page with a video screen</a> blaring moving adverts from it. It includes clips from upcoming &#8220;fall&#8221; shows, and the screen can hold 40 minutes of footage and has a battery life of 70 minutes. I know, it&#8217;s like Harry Potter and Minority Report, right? The future has arrived, right? Unfortunately not.</p>
<p>In my mind when I first heard about this I saw a full-page, flexible screen with flashes pointlessly shimmering down it a la any Philip K Dick story adapted by Hollywood. The reality is a tiny wee screen housed in some cardboard pages that&#8217;s sure to annoyingly interrupt your enjoyment of all the beautiful people.</p>
<p>Lamer yet is when you find out that this is costing CBS thousands and thousands of dollars, and is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">only getting put in mags for subscribers in LA and NYC</a>. Not sure how the numbers got crunched here, and the channel is keeping quiet on budgets, but I think it was conceived in their &#8220;cool stuff that makes it look like we&#8217;re really innovative, no matter how unsustainable the cost&#8221; department. Admittedly the traction is getting increased by people like us talking about it, but the reality is that this campaign just isn&#8217;t going to reach enough people to justify its cost. With ad margins getting smaller mid-recession, this kind of showboating seems like a dangerous course to take.</p>
<p>If you do expensive, limited experiments, do them like Fallon recently did with <a href="http://www.fallon.com/work-client/2-NBC"  target="_blank">their Make Me A Supermodel campaign</a>. By creating an interactive shop window, they wrung every bit of engagement from and exposure to its audience, which was constantly refreshing itself on the pavement in front. By contrast, CBS&#8217;s video screens have much less reach, and will look very average once the battery runs out. They also <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125073451546645129.html"  target="_blank">have to be inserted by hand</a>, which makes the whole thing take on a distinctly pre-Cambrian tone.  </p>
<p>But perhaps the most annoying aspect of this whole thing is the stuff its actually advertising, the toxically unfunny &#8220;comedies&#8221; How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory, Two And A Half Men, and new show Accidentally On Purpose, whose title alone makes it sound like it&#8217;s straight out of a two-minute brainstorm in 1986. These are shows which can only be enjoyed when off work with swine flu, when ER seems like Len Loach and when you need a show with an extra-loud laugh track to flag the jokes up for your tired, monged-out brain. If this is the future, then its sitcoms still suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

