<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Idea magazine &#187; Pepsi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/tag/pepsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk</link>
	<description>Bad Idea is an invaluable source of information and quality journalism about cultural and economic innovation in Britain and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Kraft – Cadbury Merger Seemingly Very Much On</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/09/kraft-%e2%80%93-cadbury-merger-seemingly-very-much-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/09/kraft-%e2%80%93-cadbury-merger-seemingly-very-much-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben beaumont-thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadbury World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hershey's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irene Rosenfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrigley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cadbury-kraft-merger.jpg" ></a>Last year saw Mars chew up Wrigley for $23bn, right as the world was barrelling towards all-out recession. Now once again, makers of food you&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cadbury-kraft-merger.jpg" ><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5922" title="Kraft - Cadbury Merger Seemingly Very Much On" src="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cadbury-kraft-merger-475x329.jpg" alt="Kraft - Cadbury Merger Seemingly Very Much On" width="240" height="166" /></a>Last year saw Mars chew up Wrigley for $23bn, right as the world was barrelling towards all-out recession. Now once again, makers of food you really shouldn&#8217;t eat too much of are treating mergers and acquisitions like nothing&#8217;s the matter &#8211; all signs are pointing to Cadbury&#8217;s getting bought by Kraft, despite having rejected their advances earlier in the week.</p>
<p>Kraft&#8217;s chief exec Irene Rosenfeld <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bdca7012-9cd7-11de-ab58-00144feabdc0.html"  target="_blank">told analysts yesterday</a> that &#8220;Given the complexion of the market and the global landscape, we believe it would be difficult for [Cadbury] to go it alone&#8221;. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/video/day-ahead-gold-rushes-past-1000/0C725F62-B55A-4AB0-B780-E7C620C40AFF.html"  target="_blank">These two cats</a> from the Wall Street Journal are saying the deal is definitely going to happen, in a vaguely homoerotic, suppressed bromance manner as they can&#8217;t seem to stop pawing at each other. And investors seem to think it&#8217;s going to happen too, sending Cadbury shares soaring yesterday. No doubt Hershey&#8217;s, Nestle, Kellogg and Pepsi, who have <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2zV1PCqz_AQ"  target="_blank">all also been linked with a deal</a>, are indeed troubled by the idea of Kraft getting their hands on Cadbury&#8217;s, but whether Cadbury&#8217;s is just indulging them in order to drive the actual Kraft deal higher is another matter.</p>
<p>So with it looking like just a matter of &#8220;how much&#8221; rather than &#8220;if&#8221;, one analyst told Bloomberg, &#8220;We’re moving towards the end game of consolidation in confectionery&#8221; &#8211; in other words, the world is going to have just two or three companies worldwide making almost all of our teeth-rotting treats. It&#8217;s exhumed the old debate about homegrown British manufacturing, as another company looks set to sit alongside such Americanisms as processed cheese and Oreos &#8211; &#8220;it is really about what Britain should do for a living. If so many people are to survive on this small island we must do more than hawk shares&#8221;, <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/consumer_goods/article6826645.ece"  target="_blank">says Carl Mortished</a> in today&#8217;s Times. <a href="http://business.theage.com.au/business/cadburytown-quakes-at-krafty-move-20090909-fh8e.html"  target="_blank">All the</a> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f1845a50-9c0d-11de-b214-00144feabdc0.html"  target="_blank">interviews</a> with Bournville pensioners and sighing over purple foil suggest a certain amount of pointless sentimentality surrounding the opposition to this deal, but Mortished&#8217;s point is a good one &#8211; we&#8217;re giving up and cashing in before the race to new markets (India, Brazil etc) has even properly begun. Rosenfeld&#8217;s &#8220;submit, puny Brits&#8221; comments yesterday should be seen more as symptomatic of her <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/business/09food.html?_r=1&amp;hpw"  target="_blank">steamrollering ambition</a>, rather than any real forecast of Cadbury&#8217;s ability to survive in an ameliorating recession; Kraft make <a href="http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/Brands/featured-brands/bagelfuls.aspx"  target="_blank">disgusting, oozing foods</a> that only Americans will eat, while Cadbury&#8217;s make delicious chocolate that the whole world <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/%5Cyoungistan-interested-in-stock-market-chocolates%5C/368138/"  target="_blank">now seemingly loves</a>.</p>
<p>But hawk shares we will, and the deal is a fillip for a City that has been twiddling its thumbs M&amp;A-wise this year &#8211; Goldman Sachs, UBS, and Morgan Stanley are <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/09/cadbury-takeover-recession"  target="_blank">set to receive £100m in fees</a> for putting the deal through, while <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=anQvxP5fj5XY"  target="_blank">Bloomberg reports today</a> that Kraft are in talks to bag $8bn in financing via a bridge loan from Deutsche Bank and Citigroup.</p>
<p>So the deal looks like hoisting another American corporation onto the world stage at the expense of British expansion, with a bunch of non-British banks (with admittedly lots of British employees) coining it as the deal goes through. Sigh. Well, just as long as Kraft don&#8217;t shut down Cadbury World &#8211; as any child who grew up in Birmingham will tell you, it&#8217;s a museum where chocolate is fed to you in bar form at regular intervals throughout your trip, culminating in a frenzy of sugar-rushing school parties deliriously spending their pocket money on tat in the gift shop. There are cars shaped like Creme Eggs. If you ever want to create a high-margin business that embeds a semi-religious brand empathy in consumers from a very young age, build a museum in a chocolate factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/09/kraft-%e2%80%93-cadbury-merger-seemingly-very-much-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS Video Advertising Experiment Decidedly Unfuturistic</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creative Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben beaumont-thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad.jpg" ></a>American TV network CBS has teamed up with Pepsi to bring video advertising into print, with an upcoming issue of Entertainment Weekly <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">featuring</a>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad.jpg" ><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5875" title="CBS Video Advertising Experiment Decidedly Unfuturistic" src="http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cbs-pepsi-video-ad-475x378.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="272" /></a>American TV network CBS has teamed up with Pepsi to bring video advertising into print, with an upcoming issue of Entertainment Weekly <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">featuring a page with a video screen</a> blaring moving adverts from it. It includes clips from upcoming &#8220;fall&#8221; shows, and the screen can hold 40 minutes of footage and has a battery life of 70 minutes. I know, it&#8217;s like Harry Potter and Minority Report, right? The future has arrived, right? Unfortunately not.</p>
<p>In my mind when I first heard about this I saw a full-page, flexible screen with flashes pointlessly shimmering down it a la any Philip K Dick story adapted by Hollywood. The reality is a tiny wee screen housed in some cardboard pages that&#8217;s sure to annoyingly interrupt your enjoyment of all the beautiful people.</p>
<p>Lamer yet is when you find out that this is costing CBS thousands and thousands of dollars, and is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546"  target="_blank">only getting put in mags for subscribers in LA and NYC</a>. Not sure how the numbers got crunched here, and the channel is keeping quiet on budgets, but I think it was conceived in their &#8220;cool stuff that makes it look like we&#8217;re really innovative, no matter how unsustainable the cost&#8221; department. Admittedly the traction is getting increased by people like us talking about it, but the reality is that this campaign just isn&#8217;t going to reach enough people to justify its cost. With ad margins getting smaller mid-recession, this kind of showboating seems like a dangerous course to take.</p>
<p>If you do expensive, limited experiments, do them like Fallon recently did with <a href="http://www.fallon.com/work-client/2-NBC"  target="_blank">their Make Me A Supermodel campaign</a>. By creating an interactive shop window, they wrung every bit of engagement from and exposure to its audience, which was constantly refreshing itself on the pavement in front. By contrast, CBS&#8217;s video screens have much less reach, and will look very average once the battery runs out. They also <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125073451546645129.html"  target="_blank">have to be inserted by hand</a>, which makes the whole thing take on a distinctly pre-Cambrian tone.  </p>
<p>But perhaps the most annoying aspect of this whole thing is the stuff its actually advertising, the toxically unfunny &#8220;comedies&#8221; How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory, Two And A Half Men, and new show Accidentally On Purpose, whose title alone makes it sound like it&#8217;s straight out of a two-minute brainstorm in 1986. These are shows which can only be enjoyed when off work with swine flu, when ER seems like Len Loach and when you need a show with an extra-loud laugh track to flag the jokes up for your tired, monged-out brain. If this is the future, then its sitcoms still suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/08/cbs-video-advertising-experiment-decidedly-unfuturistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

