<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Street View Launches In UK, Creates Privacy Storm In A Teacup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/</link>
	<description>Bad Idea is an invaluable source of information and quality journalism about cultural and economic innovation in Britain and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: polish media</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/comment-page-1/#comment-12635</link>
		<dc:creator>polish media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5146#comment-12635</guid>
		<description>Nowadays nobody can imagine life without a computer. What the work and study would like without them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowadays nobody can imagine life without a computer. What the work and study would like without them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinateacher</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/comment-page-1/#comment-12405</link>
		<dc:creator>chinateacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5146#comment-12405</guid>
		<description>I am not sure where you are getting your information, but nice write-up. Thanks for the great information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure where you are getting your information, but nice write-up. Thanks for the great information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5146#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>The issue is less one thing it&#039;s the consistent erosion of our privacy by new technologies with no thought to the overall implications or where it may end up in the future. If we&#039;re not discussing what&#039;s acceptable now then we may lose our chance.

Why is it ok to put images of people and their private property online which requires them to be aware the image is there and then to opt out rather than offering people the chance to opt in instead?

When you look across all the online property they own does it not disconcert you a like to know that Google may know more about you and your life than your friends or family (or the government)? Shouldn&#039;t control of our personal data rest with each individual, not with a stranger whose motives may not be in keeping with our wishes as to how we want that data used?

While, yes, this is paranoid - giving up tiny little pieces of our rights here and there may seem like nothing on their own - but together they add up to a great big whole and once they&#039;re gone they could well be gone for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is less one thing it&#8217;s the consistent erosion of our privacy by new technologies with no thought to the overall implications or where it may end up in the future. If we&#8217;re not discussing what&#8217;s acceptable now then we may lose our chance.</p>
<p>Why is it ok to put images of people and their private property online which requires them to be aware the image is there and then to opt out rather than offering people the chance to opt in instead?</p>
<p>When you look across all the online property they own does it not disconcert you a like to know that Google may know more about you and your life than your friends or family (or the government)? Shouldn&#8217;t control of our personal data rest with each individual, not with a stranger whose motives may not be in keeping with our wishes as to how we want that data used?</p>
<p>While, yes, this is paranoid &#8211; giving up tiny little pieces of our rights here and there may seem like nothing on their own &#8211; but together they add up to a great big whole and once they&#8217;re gone they could well be gone for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.badidea.co.uk/2009/03/google-street-view-launches-in-uk-creates-privacy-storm-in-a-teacup/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badidea.co.uk/?p=5146#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>My nightmare scenario is being the guy walking by a pedophiles&#039; house and getting my photo snapped. Then, when the story breaks, I&#039;m associated with the crime.

The problem with the &quot;report a concern&quot; privacy protections&quot; is that you usually don&#039;t recognize the threat until AFTER something happens. Like the guy in Oregon whose address showed up on a sex-offender website. The thugs who showed up to kick some ass didn&#039;t realize that the sex offender had moved out a new guy had moved in. I doubt the guy sat in the hospital in traction and thought &quot;man, I really should have checked that sex offender site before renting the house.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My nightmare scenario is being the guy walking by a pedophiles&#8217; house and getting my photo snapped. Then, when the story breaks, I&#8217;m associated with the crime.</p>
<p>The problem with the &#8220;report a concern&#8221; privacy protections&#8221; is that you usually don&#8217;t recognize the threat until AFTER something happens. Like the guy in Oregon whose address showed up on a sex-offender website. The thugs who showed up to kick some ass didn&#8217;t realize that the sex offender had moved out a new guy had moved in. I doubt the guy sat in the hospital in traction and thought &#8220;man, I really should have checked that sex offender site before renting the house.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

